Follow The Lee Company
Since the earliest days of space exploration, satellites have relied on propulsion systems to navigate the silent vacuum of space and perform critical maneuvers on orbit. These engines are the beating hearts of satellites, enabling them to reach their designated orbits, maintain stability, adjust their trajectories, and accurately achieve mission objectives. Whether a satellite is transmitting internet signals, monitoring the Earth’s climate, or mapping distant asteroids, propulsion is the vital mechanism that keeps it in the right place at the right time.
Propulsion isn’t a “one-size-fits-all” technology. Just as cars can run on gasoline, diesel, electricity, or even hydrogen fuel cells, satellites employ various propulsion methods—from high-thrust chemical rockets to gentle, efficient electric thrusters. Each system has its unique strengths, weaknesses, and specialized functions. Understanding these diverse solutions is vital for appreciating modern spaceflight’s marvels and envisioning the future’s groundbreaking missions. In this article, we will explore the history of satellite propulsion, examine the main types of systems currently in use, and look forward to the future of this constantly evolving technology.
The story of satellite propulsion began alongside the dawn of the Space Age. In 1957, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1, the world’s first artificial satellite. Although Sputnik itself did not include a propulsion system—it was essentially launched into orbit by its rocket and left to drift—its success ignited a global race to develop more advanced satellites capable of movement and maneuverability in space.
In the early days, chemical rockets were the only practical propulsion option based on ballistic missile technology. These systems delivered the immense thrust required to reach orbit and perform significant, rapid changes in velocity, known as delta-v. Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, significant milestones such as the American Apollo Program showcased the power of chemical propulsion. Even smaller satellites depended on hydrazine-fueled thrusters or solid propellant kick stages for orbital insertion, station-keeping, and attitude control.
As missions grew more complex, engineers started exploring lower-thrust but higher-efficiency solutions. Early electric propulsion experiments also trace back to the 1960s, but ion thrusters gained significant traction for practical missions only in the 1990s and early 2000s. NASA’s Deep Space 1 (launched in 1998) and the Dawn spacecraft (launched in 2007) famously used ion propulsion to accomplish multi-target asteroid visits, demonstrating the remarkable endurance of electric thrusters. By the 2010s, electric propulsion was starting to appear in constellations like Starlink, which were used for on-orbit station-keeping and orbit-raising.
Meanwhile, engineers steadily refined chemical systems, ushered in the development of “green” propellants to reduce toxicity, and even toyed with exotic concepts like solar sails. Propulsion has evolved into a multifaceted field, interweaving chemical, electric, and emerging alternatives into a mosaic of capabilities that continue expanding satellite technology’s frontiers.
Chemical propulsion remains the workhorse of most space missions that require strong, immediate thrust. In these engines, stored propellants ignite (or decompose) in a combustion chamber, creating hot exhaust gases expelled at high velocity through a nozzle.
Chemical propulsion can be likened to a “fire hose”—powerful, high-thrust bursts that quickly change a satellite’s velocity.
Electric propulsion is often described as the “gentle breeze” counterpart to chemical thrusters’ “fire hose.” It offers significantly lower thrust but much higher efficiency (specific impulse). Over time, the cumulative effect of small thrust leads to major velocity changes, making it particularly appealing for station-keeping, orbit-raising, and long-distance missions where propellant mass must be minimized.
Electric propulsion has proliferated in everything from small CubeSats to large geostationary telecom satellites, offering significant propellant mass savings when satellites must remain in orbit for long durations.
Beyond conventional chemical and electric thrusters, multiple cutting-edge concepts hold promise:
Choosing a propulsion system is never purely about performance; it involves a delicate dance of mission objectives, spacecraft design, cost, safety, and schedule.
Regulatory guidelines increasingly require satellites to remove themselves from crowded orbits once their missions end, often through a controlled de-orbit. Small thrusters—chemical or electric—are used for this task.
Trade-offs emerge primarily in thrust vs. efficiency:
Ultimately, engineers select a propulsion technology that balances these factors to meet each mission’s unique demands.
Looking ahead, satellite propulsion stands poised for breakthroughs on multiple fronts. Research into miniaturization is crucial for CubeSats and other small spacecraft, where every gram counts and propulsion options must be compact yet efficient. “Green” propellants promise to reduce toxicity and handling hazards, potentially lowering costs and expanding the range of feasible mission designs. Meanwhile, nuclear and advanced plasma thrusters may enable faster journeys to distant destinations like Mars or the outer solar system, opening new human and robotic exploration.
At the same time, the rising interest in on-orbit servicing and space debris cleanup is prompting engineers to design propulsion systems that support rendezvous, docking, and controlled de-orbit tasks with higher precision than ever before. We may even see hybrid approaches—chemical thrusters paired with electric propulsion—increasingly commonplace, allowing satellites to perform quick maneuvers when necessary and gentle, fuel-efficient adjustments over the long haul. In short, the future merges performance, flexibility, and sustainability to reshape how satellites navigate Earth orbit and beyond.
Satellite propulsion has evolved from simple rocket motors to a kaleidoscope of chemical, electric, and emerging systems, each with unique advantages. From the dramatic fire-hose thrust of bipropellant rockets to the gentle breeze of ion drives, these technologies have broadened mission possibilities—from Earth-orbiting services to deep-space exploration. The decades ahead will likely bring further innovation—safer fuels, higher-efficiency thrusters, and game-changing nuclear or solar-sail systems. As propulsion progresses, it will remain the key that unlocks new horizons in space, empowering satellites to venture farther, stay longer, and accomplish ever more ambitious objectives.
Always verify flow calculations by experiment.
*There are many parameters to consider when determining V-Factor. Click here for more information.
